The Business of Fashion
Agenda-setting intelligence, analysis and advice for the global fashion community.
Agenda-setting intelligence, analysis and advice for the global fashion community.
Most fashion companies are still going in the wrong direction when it comes curbing planet-warming emissions, a report published Tuesday by environmental organisation Stand.Earth found.
Brands including Nike, Kering and Zara-owner Inditex saw greenhouse gas emissions in their supply chains rise in 2021 following a “Covid dip,” according to the analysis, which examined disclosures from ten major fashion companies.
Of the companies examined, only Levi Strauss & Co is on track to reduce supply chain emissions in line with efforts to stave off the worst effects of climate change, the report found. It’s one of only two brands covered that showed a consistent downward emissions trajectory.
The report published ahead of the global COP27 climate summit, which starts Nov. 6.
ADVERTISEMENT
Learn more:
What Will It Take for Fashion to Cut Greenhouse Gas Emissions?
The industry needs to halve its emissions by the end of the decade to meet global climate goals.
A study published this week found traces of cotton from Xinjiang in nearly a fifth of the products it examined, highlighting the challenges brands face in policing their supply chains even as requirements to do so spread to raw materials from diamonds to leather and palm oil.
Overconsumption and fast fashion have become easy targets for brands flexing their climate-friendly attributes. Consumers may agree with the message — but take issue with a self-righteous tone.
Traces of cotton from Xinjiang were found in nearly a fifth of samples from American and global retailers, highlighting the challenges of complying with a US law aimed at blocking imports that could be linked to forced labour in China.
The fashion industry continues to advance voluntary and unlikely solutions to its plastic problem. Only higher prices will flip the script, writes Kenneth P. Pucker.